Discussions
Sign In
Home
›
stockstephanie
›
Comments
Sign In
·
Register
Activity
Discussions
1
Comments
2
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Sign In
Register
stockstephanie
About
Username
stockstephanie
Joined
April 29
Visits
24
Last Active
June 29
Roles
Member
Activity
Discussions
1
Comments
2
Comments
That works so much better! Thanks, that helps a ton : )
in
Checking Edge Separation
Comment by
stockstephanie
June 12
For anyone else that needs a similar solution, I ended up doing something more like: violation = ((((NWELL.and(OXIDE)).not(GATE)).interacting(GATE, 1, 1)).edges.and(OXIDE.edges)).with_length(0.001.um, 0.999.um) This seems to be a viable solution …
in
Checking Edge Separation
Comment by
stockstephanie
June 11
Powered by Vanilla