I raised an issue with trace path in https://klayout.de/forum/discussion/2810/trace-path-issue#latest. Thanks for addressing it in bugfix #2201. After switching from 0.30.4 to 0.30.5, unfortunately

klayout fails to read CELLNAME S_CELL_OFFSET property on windows when it's value is > 4GB #2073

actually please ignorie #2 and #3. Im ramping up on this tool so prone to asking "silly" questions like these! For anyone following this thread who is a newbie at this tool, my issue

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<< Layer Information Cross-checker: KLayout Forum #2614 >>$ [python3] ./f2641-KazzzS.

'klayout.dbcore.Instance'>) #202 m90 1006.94,1338.24 type : <class 'klayout.dbcore.DCellInstArray'> vars : {} 0 0 0,0 0,0-D- inst = <klayout.dbcore.ParentI

ERROR: Error at argument #2 (option --a-layer-map-file=map): Expected end of text here: <?xml ver .. in line 1)

QPlainTextEdit { background-color : #282923;}""")monokai = ''' basic: 'Alert'=(color:'#ff80ac',background:'#3b3b32'), 'Attribute'=(bold:false,colo

#1. filter all cells with Fleld and PA/PB in cellname#2. check sub-cells in "field" cell, if with DARK and PA/PB in cell name add to array#3. return a arraay with unique cell namesde

file #2 #3 have the same pCell. same location all parameters same except for one

the screenshot of code #1 is empty , then I run the code #2 ,It returned the same layout_view hash but the screenshot came back.

Then I run the code#2:

#Bian#24.01.2023schematic("mos")deepreport_lvsnwell = input(3, 0)poly = input(2, 0)diff = input(1, 0)sd = diff-poly$dbu_value=dbuclass MOS4Extractor < RBA:

I debugged your issue and actually it is a side effect of a duplicate cell name: the "WaveguideCoplanarStraight$66" cell is present twice: with ID #63 and #258. And there is another

RBA::QBrush::new(RBA::QColor::new("#202020")), # base RBA::QBrush::new(RBA::QColor::new("#101010")), # window) palette.setColorGroup(RBA::QPalette::Inactive,

as connected , but actually just #1 & #2 is one group, #3 , #4 are individually stand, not sure there is a better way to sort them ? I am trying to achieve this, will post when overcome

######2021-06-16DIE=input(71,0)shiftcheck=0.05LayoutLibrary = RBA::Application::instance.main_window.current_view.active_cellview.nameputs "Library : #{LayoutLibrary}"LayerList=[[&a

import pyaimport arrayimport sysimport mathimport timemw = pya.Application.instance().main_window()layout = pya.Application.instance().main_window().current_view().active_cellview().layout() topcell =

lv.commit()#selections #1 select_inside#2 select_interacting#3 select_not_inside#4 select_not_interacting#5 select_not_outside#6 select_not_overlapping#7 select_outside#8 select_overlappinglay1 = 9

been implemented #Modifications #Tracy Groller#2/10/21#This Script is based on the Solution Matthias provided in January 2017 Klayout thread.#https://www.klayout.de/forum/discussion/comment/4167#Comm

3. #1, #2 bring me to the other problem, if the parent cell is not only contain "cell", but also others, then the other cells also be flatten.